« Broadway: a real showstopper | Main | Guy vs Guy »

May 18, 2006

So, what ARE you, anyway?

It seems as though Indian women are the hot minority in the US right now. Actually, I got this from (where else) Ethnorotica where he asks why there is such a constant focus on what the white man finds attractive. I originally found it a little bit useless from my point of view, but apparently it DOES matter to me, or at least it should. If the Man decides that he wants black women, for example, then I should worry, or something, since black women are what I should want, and I could be threatened.

Once again white men decide what is desirable and beautiful. If you fall outside that vision, then you are "other" or simply unattractive. Sure, each of us individually can say that we are attracted to people that are pretty, handsome, sensitive, etc., and that this overarching white male view doesn't affect you (whether you be red, yellow, black, white, straight, gay or whatever) but it probably does, even if you belong to a closely-knit ethnic community. I'm talking about the dominant (white male) view of what you are. From the Telegraph article cited in the link above:

It may have taken a light-eyed Indian beauty to capture the hearts and minds of American men, but when Rai took the Miss World crown in 1994, it raised the profile of south Asian women outside their own region.

In other words, white men saw her as a symbol of beauty, and now that he has, she has been legitimized as beautiful. I wonder what the Man thought of her before that. Reading about all this type of thing can make one sensitive to what should probably be rather benign words. Right now, the word "exotic" seems annoying. According to Merriam-Webster, it means "strikingly, excitingly, or mysteriously different or unusual", which is the active definition here. It once again makes me realize how defined and legitimized I am by the Man.

But then, if the Man doesn't define me, who will? Me? Easier said than done. When people ask me where I'm from, more than half the time the answer "Montreal" will not satisfy them. Neither will "Ontario" (where I was born) or "Canada". White people want to classify my otherness, and non-white people seem to want to share some kind of non-white solidarity, which is alternately comforting and annoying. When I resist the labelling, they simply think that I am being difficult, which is true. Resistance creates difficulties. But damnit, I do get sick and tired of it sometimes. Here are the types of questions and comments I get:

  • "No, but, where are you from?"
  • "Oh, I didn't know you were black. (This can happen when someone meets me after having spoken to me on the phone. My landlady is the most notable such case.)
  • "So, what ARE you, anyway?"

What am I, indeed. What in the holy name of flying sheep do you think I am? 150 years ago the big brains of the day weren't even sure. Many weren't certain that we should be classified with whites as humans in the same sense that they are.

Now, some people might say that if they go to a country where they are the visible minority, then they might get asked similar questions. They might have certain assumptions made about them and be defined by the Man of that part of the world. They might say that this sort of thing is human nature, not racism. This may be true, and I wouldn't necessarily say that it is racist (although I might in certain circumstances), but these people will likely never be in the position I am in in North America. They will never be othered and defined by some other group of people. It is too easy for them to say these things, like it's just "Oh, well, that's just the way it is." I would recommend that they ask a white woman who has spent time in the Middle East how it feels. Or even a white woman who has spent time with young Middle Eastern men coming to North America for school, expecting all white women to fuck them since they're all sluts anyway. This is just for starters.

Have you ever met a person that is dating an Arab/black person/white person/Native person, instead of a person? They fall in love with the diversity that they are encountering, the "rich culture" and all the expectations of being with that Other, but the relationship fails because the Other realizes that it wasn't they who were loved, but the racial exoticness that the Man thought was fashionable at the time. Meanwhile, the first person, figures that Arabs/black people/white people/Native people aren't worth dating because the cultures are too different, or that they are too sensitive or something like that. This is simply pathetic when it happens.

I would like anyone reading this to really question what they think of how beauty is presented. We've heard a lot of the outrage of the so-called plus-size women and how their beauty is not well-represented. I think that they aren't the only ones.

P.S.: I know a couple of half-Indian women. Maybe they could collaborate and weigh in on what an Indian woman thinks about the Telegraph article. (Hey, I can be an ignorant dweeb, too.) In particular, the following reminds me of zura:

Still, she has found that Indian men look down upon her American-side, while American men fail to understand her Indian-ness.

Posted by JonasParker at May 18, 2006 1:22 AM

Comments

Good gosh, where to start... This entry of yours really rings true on so many levels. This begs for its own blog entry: http://zurants.blogspot.com/2006/05/exoticism-or-je-me-souviens-ostille.html

Posted by: zura at May 18, 2006 3:12 PM

Jonas, I remember when I asked you where you were from. I noticed your reluctance and was wondering why. For myself, I ask everyone where they are from. I feel it is a part of trying to get to know them and where they are from. See if there is another connection on some level. And since I am new here I'm trying to get a feel for what personalities are from where. Verdun, McMasterville, St-Leonard, Nova Scotia, Quebec, Ontario... In your case, I found you to be a unique and interesting person and wanted to know more about you. I don't think I have a any problem with race. All of this is what I think and believe consciously, though I can't speak for my sub-consious. I really hope they are on the same page.

I know it's not the same, but I have gotten a taste of what it is like to be judged/rejected solely by my appearance. The elite French of Versailles did not take kindly to a long-haired redhead dressed all in black with a leather biker jacket. It's different because it was my chosen appearance, but I think I got a feel for what it's like with the condescending glances and remarks.

I've mentioned it before that racism was worse back where I'm from, but that doesn't make any form of it here justifiable.

Posted by: Frank at May 19, 2006 6:41 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?